Skip to content

Conversation

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

This was an issue that dependencies weren't yet ready for it. I think
that has now been fixed.
@dwhswenson dwhswenson changed the title update for SPEC0 as of Dec 2024 Update for SPEC0 as of Dec 2024 Dec 23, 2024
@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member Author

OpenMM seems to exist on PyPI with Python 3.13 support, but not on conda-forge. We'll either have to change our install to take OpenMM from PyPI, or wait a bit longer on this.

Until users need Python 3.13, I'll just wait.

@sroet
Copy link
Member

sroet commented Jan 6, 2025

OpenMM seems to exist on PyPI with Python 3.13 support, but not on conda-forge. We'll either have to change our install to take OpenMM from PyPI, or wait a bit longer on this.

That is strange as it should have been up since 12-12-2024:
Screenshot from 2025-01-06 17-00-03

@sroet
Copy link
Member

sroet commented Jan 6, 2025

On a tangential note, since conda 23.10, conda is using the mamba solver under the hood by default: https://conda.github.io/conda-libmamba-solver/user-guide/ so you can probably drop back to a default conda install for the tests

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member Author

That is strange as it should have been up since 12-12-2024:

That's MDTraj. 😉 Check for OpenMM; it is still missing 3.13.

@sroet
Copy link
Member

sroet commented Jan 6, 2025

That is strange as it should have been up since 12-12-2024:

That's MDTraj. 😉 Check for OpenMM; it is still missing 3.13.

😅 I see it is missing now. Brain is apparently still in xmas holiday mode.

@sroet
Copy link
Member

sroet commented Jan 29, 2025

Openmm 8.2.0 is now available on conda-forge for python 3.13 😄

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like now we're waiting on numba (transitive dependency from openmmtools). They're actively working on that feedstock (as in, recent commit still running builds... 2+ hour build process on Windows!)

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member Author

close-reopen cycle on this to get tests to run again

@dwhswenson dwhswenson closed this May 11, 2025
@dwhswenson dwhswenson reopened this May 11, 2025
@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member Author

This is now failing with the same issue as #1173 (I was hoping maybe it was a Python 3.10-specific issue?). But that means it got through the installation phase. So; good news: we can probably merge this soon. Bad news: I have to figure out #1173 first!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants