Skip to content

Conversation

@rabbitstack
Copy link
Owner

What is the purpose of this PR / why it is needed?

To make the rule more resistant to false positives, add the condition to evaluate the symbol pertaining to the thread start address.

What type of change does this PR introduce?


Uncomment one or more /kind <> lines:

/kind feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

/kind bug-fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

/kind refactor (non-breaking change that restructures the code, while not changing the original functionality)

/kind breaking (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected

/kind cleanup

/kind improvement

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind other (change that doesn't pertain to any of the above categories)

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?


Uncomment one or more /area <> lines:

/area instrumentation

/area telemetry

/area rule-engine

/area filters

/area yara

/area event

/area captures

/area alertsenders

/area outputs

/area rules

/area filaments

/area config

/area cli

/area tests

/area ci

/area build

/area docs

/area deps

/area other

Special notes for the reviewer


Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


To make the rule more resistant to false positives, add the condition to evaluate
the symbol pertaining to the thread start address.
@rabbitstack rabbitstack added the rules Anything related to detection rules label Mar 20, 2025
@rabbitstack rabbitstack changed the title chore(rules): Improve Unsigned DLL injection via remote thread rule chore(rules): Improve Unsigned DLL injection via remote thread rule Mar 20, 2025
@rabbitstack rabbitstack merged commit 4473838 into master Apr 11, 2025
9 checks passed
@rabbitstack rabbitstack deleted the solidfy-unsigned-dll-inject-via-remote-thread-rule branch April 11, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rules Anything related to detection rules

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants