Skip to content

Conversation

@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor

@iiio2 iiio2 commented Sep 7, 2025

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from danielroe as a code owner September 7, 2025 15:58
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 7, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@33159

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@33159

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@33159

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@33159

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@33159

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@33159

commit: ebb0688

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 7, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed the legacy Gitpod configuration file .gitpod.yml. Added .gitpod/automations.yaml introducing a single automation task "Start playground" that runs pnpm play and is triggered on postDevcontainerStart and manual. Updated .devcontainer/devcontainer.json formatting and added forwardPorts: [3000] and portsAttributes for port 3000 with label "Application" and onAutoForward: openPreview. Removed prior Gitpod prebuilds and the previous tasks sequence for install/dev prepare/play.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly describes the main change of migrating the Gitpod configuration to Ona, clearly reflecting the primary purpose of the pull request without extraneous detail.
Description Check ✅ Passed The description directly references the rebranding of Gitpod to Ona and explains that this PR provides the migration setup, which is clearly related to the changes made in the repository.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8073e3 and ebb0688.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (2 hunks)
  • .gitpod/automations.yaml (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
.gitpod/automations.yaml (5)

5-7: Make the long‑running dev server a Service, keep install/prepare as a Task.

pnpm play is likely a long‑running server. Best practice: model it as a Service and keep setup as a short‑lived Task, improving observability and lifecycle control.

Apply this rewrite:

-tasks:
-  install-and-dev:
-    name: Install dependencies and start dev
-    command: |
-      pnpm install
-      pnpm dev:prepare
-      pnpm play
-    triggeredBy:
-      - postDevcontainerStart
-      - manual
+services:
+  dev:
+    name: Nuxt Dev Server
+    commands:
+      start: pnpm play
+    triggeredBy:
+      - postDevcontainerStart
+tasks:
+  setup:
+    name: Install dependencies and prepare workspace
+    command: |
+      pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
+      pnpm dev:prepare
+    triggeredBy:
+      - postDevcontainerStart
+      - manual

Note: Services are intended for long‑running processes; Tasks are short‑lived and one‑off. (ona.com)


8-10: Consider adding postEnvironmentStart to cover runner resume scenarios.

On AWS runners, resumes may not re‑trigger postDevcontainerStart. If you want setup to re‑run on every environment start/resume, include postEnvironmentStart.

Example:

     triggeredBy:
-      - postDevcontainerStart
+      - postDevcontainerStart
+      - postEnvironmentStart
       - manual

Source: (ona.com)


5-6: Lock installs for reproducibility.

Use pnpm install --frozen-lockfile to prevent drift from the committed lockfile.


1-10: Replicate old port 3000 “open-preview” behaviour via devcontainer.json.

Since the Classic ports config is removed, add this to .devcontainer/devcontainer.json to auto‑forward 3000 and open a preview/browser:

{
  "appPort": [3000],
  "portsAttributes": {
    "3000": {
      "onAutoForward": "openPreview"
    }
  }
}

Sources: (code.visualstudio.com, git.lance1416.com)


10-10: Add a newline at end of file.

Fixes the YAML lint error.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9fe2541 and b8073e3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .gitpod.yml (0 hunks)
  • .gitpod/automations.yaml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .gitpod.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.gitpod/automations.yaml

[error] 10-10: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.gitpod/automations.yaml (1)

1-10: Schema, path, and triggers look correct.

  • File location .gitpod/automations.yaml and root tasks: map align with Ona/Gitpod Automations spec.
  • triggeredBy values postDevcontainerStart and manual are valid triggers.

Sources: (gitpod.io, ona.com)

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 7, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #33159 will not alter performance

Comparing iiio2:feat/migrate-gitpod (ebb0688) with main (23aa59d)1

Summary

✅ 10 untouched

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (c69e4c3) during the generation of this report, so 23aa59d was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@danielroe danielroe changed the title feat: migrate gitpod to ona chore: migrate gitpod to ona Sep 12, 2025
@danielroe danielroe merged commit 25e91a2 into nuxt:main Oct 7, 2025
82 of 84 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2025
@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor Author

iiio2 commented Oct 8, 2025

Thanks @danielroe . 😊

@iiio2 iiio2 deleted the feat/migrate-gitpod branch October 8, 2025 02:21
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2025
danielroe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants