style: update color from #00a893 to #3badda #309
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for commit-check ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughUpdated README badge colors and inline badge ordering; refreshed docs CSS palette and variables; reworked Sphinx CLI-help parsing and emission to build Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Conf as docs/conf.py
participant CLI as subprocess (CLI)
participant Parser as "line-by-line parser"
participant Writer as "cli_args.rst writer"
Conf->>CLI: run CLI to get help (subprocess.run(..., check=True))
CLI-->>Conf: stdout (help text)
Conf->>Parser: split help text into lines
Parser->>Parser: find "options:" (case-insensitive)
alt options present
Parser->>Parser: match option lines, collect descriptions (lookahead)
Parser->>Conf: emit `std:option` blocks (with blank lines)
else no options
Parser->>Conf: preserve original lines
end
Conf->>Writer: join lines with "\n"
Writer-->>Conf: write `cli_args.rst`
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (14)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.rst(2 hunks)docs/_static/extra_css.css(1 hunks)docs/conf.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Maintain Sphinx documentation under docs/ to build HTML docs with sphinx-build
Files:
docs/_static/extra_css.cssdocs/conf.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/conf.py (1)
58-59: LGTM! Sphinx theme palette updated consistently.The palette changes from "light-blue"/"deep-purple" to "blue"/"light-blue" are applied consistently across both light and dark color schemes.
Also applies to: 68-69
docs/_static/extra_css.css (2)
10-10: Header background color updated consistently.The navigation header background color is updated from the old teal (#009485) to the new blue (#2c9ccd), matching the overall branding update.
18-53: Comprehensive brand color theme added with proper structure.The new CSS rules establish a complete color scheme using the brand color #2c9ccd, including:
- Root CSS variables for reusable color definitions
- Navigation link active/hover states
- Primary button styling with hover effects
- Code block and syntax highlighting accents
- Admonition title styling
The implementation follows CSS best practices with proper use of CSS variables, rgba() for transparency, and consistent hover state handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/conf.py (1)
139-150: Logic looks correct, but consider clarifying the comment.The refactored option parsing correctly:
- Uses
match()instead ofsearch()for precise start-of-line matching- Adds blank lines before/after
std:optiondirectives for proper reStructuredText formatting- Preserves original help text by appending the line at line 150 (even after adding directives)
The comment at line 144 says "Always add a blank line" but the blank line is only added when there's a match. Consider rewording to: "Add a blank line before std:option directive to avoid indentation issues."
Apply this diff to clarify the comment:
- # Always add a blank line before std:option to avoid indentation issues + # Add a blank line before std:option directive to avoid indentation issues
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/conf.py(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Maintain Sphinx documentation under docs/ to build HTML docs with sphinx-build
Files:
docs/conf.py
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/conf.py (6)
58-59: LGTM! Palette updated for branding consistency.The color scheme changes from light-blue/deep-purple to blue/light-blue align with the PR's objective to update branding colors.
68-69: LGTM! Dark mode palette updated consistently.The dark mode palette mirrors the light mode changes, ensuring a consistent color scheme across both themes.
117-117: Good addition: fail-fast on subprocess errors.The
check=Trueparameter ensures that the documentation build fails immediately ifcommit-check --helpexits with a non-zero code, making build errors explicit rather than silent.Note: There's no error handling around this call, so any failure will crash the Sphinx setup. This is likely intentional for build-time error visibility.
120-124: LGTM! Refactored to list-based doc building.The refactor from string concatenation to list-based construction is more efficient and provides better code structure for building the documentation incrementally.
130-136: LGTM! Improved options section detection.The exact case-insensitive match for "options:" is more precise than a substring search. The
strippedvariable keeps the condition check clean, and thecontinuestatement ensures the line is only added once.
154-154: LGTM! File write consistent with list-based refactor.The
write_text("\n".join(doc))correctly joins the list elements into the final documentation string.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/conf.py (2)
112-118: Add error handling for subprocess failure.While
check=Trueensures immediate failure on errors, the subprocess call lacks a try/except block to handleCalledProcessErrorgracefully. Ifcommit-checkis unavailable or returns a non-zero exit code, the entire documentation build will fail with an unhandled exception.Consider adding error handling to provide a clearer error message or fallback:
- result = subprocess.run( - ["commit-check", "--help"], - stdout=subprocess.PIPE, - stderr=subprocess.PIPE, - encoding="utf-8", - check=True, # ensure errors fail immediately - ) + try: + result = subprocess.run( + ["commit-check", "--help"], + stdout=subprocess.PIPE, + stderr=subprocess.PIPE, + encoding="utf-8", + check=True, + ) + except (subprocess.CalledProcessError, FileNotFoundError) as exc: + raise RuntimeError( + f"Failed to generate CLI documentation: {exc}. " + "Ensure 'commit-check' is installed and accessible." + ) from exc
54-74: Use exact hex values for the intended colors.The PR’s goal was to change from
#00a893to#3badda, but Material palette names “blue” (#2196F3) and “light-blue” (#03A9F4) don’t match those hex codes. Specify the precise hex values (e.g."primary": "#3badda") or choose palette names that yield the intended colors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/conf.py(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Maintain Sphinx documentation under docs/ to build HTML docs with sphinx-build
Files:
docs/conf.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/conf.py (2)
162-165: Add bounds checking for split result.The code assumes
parts[2]exists after splitting, but if an option line contains only the option flags without a description, this will raise anIndexError.Add a bounds check:
# Add the current line (contains the option and start of description) parts = line.split(None, 2) # Split on whitespace, max 2 splits - if len(parts) > 2: + if len(parts) >= 3: description_lines.append(parts[2])Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
126-126: Regex pattern matches all existing CLI options. No missing short or long flags or metavar formats were found incommit-check --help.
docs/conf.py
Outdated
| # Look ahead for continuation lines | ||
| j = i + 1 | ||
| while j < len(lines) and lines[j].startswith( | ||
| " " | ||
| ): | ||
| description_lines.append(lines[j].strip()) | ||
| skip_lines.add(j) | ||
| j += 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace hardcoded indentation with dynamic detection.
The hardcoded 24-space string for detecting continuation lines is fragile and will break if the CLI help format changes.
Consider detecting indentation dynamically:
- # Look ahead for continuation lines
- j = i + 1
- while j < len(lines) and lines[j].startswith(
- " "
- ):
- description_lines.append(lines[j].strip())
- skip_lines.add(j)
- j += 1
+ # Look ahead for continuation lines (indented more than option line)
+ option_indent = len(line) - len(line.lstrip())
+ j = i + 1
+ while j < len(lines):
+ next_line = lines[j]
+ next_indent = len(next_line) - len(next_line.lstrip())
+ # Continuation lines are indented more than the option line
+ if next_line.strip() and next_indent > option_indent:
+ description_lines.append(next_line.strip())
+ skip_lines.add(j)
+ j += 1
+ else:
+ break📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Look ahead for continuation lines | |
| j = i + 1 | |
| while j < len(lines) and lines[j].startswith( | |
| " " | |
| ): | |
| description_lines.append(lines[j].strip()) | |
| skip_lines.add(j) | |
| j += 1 | |
| # Look ahead for continuation lines (indented more than option line) | |
| option_indent = len(line) - len(line.lstrip()) | |
| j = i + 1 | |
| while j < len(lines): | |
| next_line = lines[j] | |
| next_indent = len(next_line) - len(next_line.lstrip()) | |
| # Continuation lines are indented more than the option line | |
| if next_line.strip() and next_indent > option_indent: | |
| description_lines.append(next_line.strip()) | |
| skip_lines.add(j) | |
| j += 1 | |
| else: | |
| break |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/conf.py around lines 167 to 174, the loop uses a hardcoded 24-space
string to detect continuation lines which is brittle; replace it by computing
the expected indentation at runtime (derive the leading-space count from the
current line or the initial description line) and then check
lines[j].startswith(" " * indent) (or compare leading-space counts) to detect
continuations, appending stripped content and adding j to skip_lines as before.
7a0fce7 to
d00b06d
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #309 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.15% 87.29% +0.14%
==========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 685 685
==========================================
+ Hits 597 598 +1
+ Misses 88 87 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
noxfile.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
noxfile.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Provide nox sessions: build, coverage, lint, install, and docs (if applicable)
Files:
noxfile.py
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-10-03T10:28:06.793Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: commit-check/commit-check#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-03T10:28:06.793Z
Learning: Applies to noxfile.py : Provide nox sessions: build, coverage, lint, install, and docs (if applicable)
Applied to files:
noxfile.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
- GitHub Check: install (3.14, macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.14, ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: install (3.13, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.14, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.12, ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: install (3.13, ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: install (3.13, macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.11, ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: install (3.12, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.11, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.11, macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.10, ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: install (3.9, ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: install (3.9, macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.10, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: install (3.9, windows-latest)
| def docs(session): | ||
| session.install(".[docs]") | ||
| session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-W", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") | ||
| session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the necessity of removing the -W flag.
The -W flag treats Sphinx warnings as errors, ensuring documentation quality. Removing it may allow warnings to accumulate unnoticed. While the AI summary suggests this aligns with subprocess changes in docs/conf.py, the connection to the color updates in this PR is unclear.
Consider keeping the -W flag if possible to maintain build strictness, or document why it was necessary to remove it (e.g., if the color changes introduce unavoidable warnings).
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are current Sphinx warnings that would fail with -W
# Run sphinx-build to see if there are any warnings
cd docs
sphinx-build -W -E -b html . ../_build/html 2>&1 | tee /tmp/sphinx_warnings.txt
# Check if there were warnings
if grep -i "warning" /tmp/sphinx_warnings.txt; then
echo "===== Warnings found that would fail with -W flag ====="
grep -i "warning" /tmp/sphinx_warnings.txt
else
echo "===== No warnings found - keeping -W flag is recommended ====="
fiLength of output: 162
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Directly check for Sphinx warnings with -W
sphinx-build -W -E -b html docs _build/html 2>&1 | grep -i warning || echo "===== No warnings found ====="Length of output: 29
Re-add -W flag to Sphinx build
Documentation builds cleanly with no warnings; dropping -W is unnecessary and weakens strictness. Restore -W in the docs session:
- session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html")
+ session.run("sphinx-build", "-W", "-E", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") | |
| session.run("sphinx-build", "-W", "-E", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In noxfile.py around line 56, the sphinx-build invocation dropped the strictness
flag; update the session.run call to include the "-W" flag (e.g., add "-W" to
the arguments passed to "sphinx-build" along with "-E", "-b", "html", "docs",
"_build/html") so Sphinx treats warnings as errors during the docs session.
7444ee5 to
05faeb0
Compare
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Style
Chores