Skip to content

[snap] GUI-less snap packaging #4549

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
sharder996 wants to merge 23 commits into
base: s390x-support
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[snap] GUI-less snap packaging #4549

sharder996 wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

@sharder996
Copy link
Collaborator

@sharder996 sharder996 commented Dec 4, 2025

Add the ability to package Multipass without the Flutter GUI in CI.

MULTI-2374

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.18%. Comparing base (70e5464) to head (ee17564).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           s390x-support    #4549      +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage          87.17%   87.18%   +0.02%     
=================================================
  Files                247      245       -2     
  Lines              14276    14125     -151     
=================================================
- Hits               12444    12314     -130     
+ Misses              1832     1811      -21

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sharder996 sharder996 force-pushed the non-gui-snap branch 4 times, most recently from ccdef08 to a672520 Compare December 4, 2025 16:56
@sharder996 sharder996 force-pushed the s390x-support branch 5 times, most recently from 0c4f191 to e50225d Compare December 18, 2025 00:59
@sharder996 sharder996 mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sharder996