Skip to content

Conversation

@prakritim01
Copy link

@prakritim01 prakritim01 commented Dec 13, 2025

"This PR removes the <1.9.0 constraint for numpydoc in build_tools/update_environments_and_lock_files.py to allow CI to use newer versions. Note: I was unable to run the lockfile update script locally due to missing Conda environment tools. I am happy to let a maintainer (or the bot) update the lockfiles if needed."
Fixed in numpy/numpydoc#622, which is included in the latest release: https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/releases/tag/v1.10.0

@github-actions github-actions bot added the CI:Linter failure The linter CI is failing on this PR label Dec 13, 2025
Copy link
Member

@lucyleeow lucyleeow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR. Looks good except the lint failure.

I would recommend you read our contributing guide before making PRs: https://scikit-learn.org/dev/developers/contributing.html#id1

It would be useful for the reviewer if you included the following information:

Fixed in numpy/numpydoc#622, which is included in the latest release: https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/releases/tag/v1.10.0

"pytest-cov": "<=6.3.0",
}


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lint is probably failing due to this line.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review! I have updated the PR description with the link to the numpydoc fix as requested.

It looks like the pre-commit.ci bot pushed a fix for the linting issues, so the checks should be passing now. Let me know if anything else is needed!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the CI:Linter failure The linter CI is failing on this PR label Dec 15, 2025
@prakritim01
Copy link
Author

Thanks @lucyleeow! I have updated the PR description with the link you requested. I also ran ruff format locally and force-pushed the fix, so the linting issues should be resolved now.

Copy link
Member

@lucyleeow lucyleeow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks.

@lucyleeow lucyleeow added the Waiting for Second Reviewer First reviewer is done, need a second one! label Dec 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Waiting for Second Reviewer First reviewer is done, need a second one!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants