Skip to content

Conversation

@baermat
Copy link
Member

@baermat baermat commented Oct 22, 2025

Motivation

Certain services (like IoT) allow colons in their resource names, and therefore in their arns. This PR adds an option for this

Changes

  • add option to _resource_arn to allow colons

@baermat baermat added docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes notes: skip Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes semver: minor Non-breaking changes which can be included in minor releases, but not in patch releases labels Oct 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Test Results - Preflight, Unit

22 367 tests  +1   20 617 ✅ +1   16m 21s ⏱️ +48s
     1 suites ±0    1 750 💤 ±0 
     1 files   ±0        0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 412623c. ± Comparison against base commit 06df84d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Test Results (amd64) - Acceptance

7 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   3m 25s ⏱️ +8s
1 suites ±0   2 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 412623c. ± Comparison against base commit 06df84d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Test Results (amd64) - Integration, Bootstrap

    5 files  ±0      5 suites  ±0   2h 38m 36s ⏱️ + 1m 2s
5 252 tests ±0  4 737 ✅ ±0  515 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
5 258 runs  ±0  4 737 ✅ ±0  521 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 412623c. ± Comparison against base commit 06df84d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2025

LocalStack Community integration with Pro

    2 files  ±0      2 suites  ±0   2h 0m 2s ⏱️ -6s
4 878 tests ±0  4 523 ✅ ±0  355 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
4 880 runs  ±0  4 523 ✅ ±0  357 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 412623c. ± Comparison against base commit 06df84d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@baermat baermat marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2025 13:22
Copy link
Member

@viren-nadkarni viren-nadkarni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I strongly suggest adding a unit-test that covers this new argument. Looks good otherwise!

@baermat baermat merged commit 2467f0d into main Oct 23, 2025
42 checks passed
@baermat baermat deleted the iot/fix-group-names branch October 23, 2025 07:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes notes: skip Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes semver: minor Non-breaking changes which can be included in minor releases, but not in patch releases

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants